Elements of National Interest Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Elements of National Interest - Essay Example advocator refers to the ability to directly or indirectly determine the attitude and behavior of people either volitionally or by coercion to get the desired end result. The principle of power is another key the Statesn principle that has significantly influenced the American foreign policy strategies (Jentleson, 17). On the other hand, the principle of public security measures is important particularly with regard to the fact that peaceful coexistence enables inter discipline institutionalism and economic interdependence between countries. largely Peace can be defined as a state of harmony that exists when there is no violence, hostility and aggression. It takes into consideration inter boundary relations among countries A wide practice is the current European yoke which has thrived on both the principles of power, prosperity and peace. It is the interaction of these principles that are embedded in Americas national interest. Am ericas power and show of might in protecting its citizen against aggression and plunder by use of nuclear weapon is aimed at ensuring peaceful co existence of its citizens and the neighboring countries. The elements of national interest emanate from the fact that those who direct power, be they leaders or politicians play a essential role in the development of the country and its prosperity. Throughout the history both during the cold war plosive (1945-1990) as well as in the present times, many of the aspects of the US foreign policy strategies have occasionally come into conflict with the 4Ps as well as with one another. A good example of a contradiction between the principles and the US national interests during the cold war period was the Arms racecourse between the unify States and the Soviet Union. At the heart of the cold war were the ideological differences between America and its allies and the Soviet Union and its aligned countries. For example the Western bloc lead b y the United States believed in capitalism, democracy, freedom and liberty while the Eastern bloc lead by the Soviet Union championed Communism and greater state control of politics and economics of their countries. The cold war resulted into a good military and political tension between the United States and the Soviet Union and allies. The conflict between the US foreign policy strategies and its national interests during the cold was that while the stock piling more weapons including nuclear weapons was good for the security interests of the nation, it proved to be costly and resulted in an economic back lash that significantly bear upon the principle of prosperity. The major pot of that the leaders of the United States had to make during conflict of their principles of prosperity and national security interests was to compromise their economic prosperity for the sake of national security interests. Despite the cost, the US continued to be involved in the arms race with the So viet Union and its allies. It also attempted to expand its influence to counter communism through regime changes in the Soviet aligned countries and this particularly proved to be politically and economically expensive as was evidenced by the Viet Nam war, Korean War and the Gulf war. on the whole these wars proved to be costly and contradicted the principles of prosperity but the leaders chose to trade off the economic costs with the need to achieve more influence and power in the global affairs. The positive consequence of the trade offs in this regard was the fact that America achieved power and more influence in the