Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Why College Athletes Should Be Paid$53.4 Million the unite salary of the top 15 paid coaches in division 1 college football, $0 the combined salary of all student-athletes. Over the past few decades, college athletics pull in gained popity across the United States. Whether it is football, basketball, or baseball, ever since the form of the century, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of receipts to their individual(prenominal) Universities. A recent study found that the University of Texas gymnastic Program had the highest revenue of any other University at a little over $ cxx million. Yet with this large sum of funds, NO college athletes argon legally equilibrize for their work. According to NCAA rules, You argon non eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever Taken accept or the cartel of pay, for competing in that sport.While it may seem suspicious and cheating(prenominal) to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athle tes is a fate not only to keep competition at a cool off concord in college athletics, solely also to encourage students to graduate and scram their college degrees. assimilator athletes should be compensated for their work, as they argon the sole reason for the Athletic Programs surplus in revenue. These athletes are working for the coachs and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their esteemive reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work.E actuallywhere else athletes are paid, so why shouldnt college students too? Some critics may ask that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The tyke league for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do view pay according to the teams revenue. Also, with all the time practicing and working in the classroom, how many athletes have time to actually get a conjecture? Another argument that supports paying college athletes is that these full-ride scholarships siren to the best athletes do not actually cover all their expenses. Many athletes still sack upt afford to have their parents come to the stadium and watch the games. With all of the respect and publicity of these athletes, it goes unnoticed that a great deal of the players live very near to the poverty line. Due to this lack of money, black-markets are created. Here, boosters that represent the University give these playerscars, spending money, or anything they truly emergency, and in return, these players go to their respective University. at that place have been many instances of this before, one prominent example is that of Reggie Bush, the running spine for the University of Southern California from 2003-2005. Bush was paid by boosters to attend USC, which bungled NCAA rules. Bushs mother was having trouble paying rent for her apartment at the time in Pasadena. Bush f elt obligated to take this offer, as there was no other way to make money and pay for his mothers home. These boosters actions are not only are illegal, but create unfairness in competition amongst the NCAA. These universities that violate NCAA rules have an upper edge in recruiting top prospects. Schools are then tempted to violate such rules to even out the playing field.The last and arguably the nearly important reason to pay college athletes, is that it go away ensure that most student-athletes forget complete their college degrees. Paying student-athletes would provide an incentive to stay in school and complete their degree programs, instead of leaving early for the professional leagues Which brings me sustain to the question, Should college athletes get paid? If athletes are paid to play, not only can they cover some of their college expenses that scholarships couldnt, but also now they will want to finish their education. NCAA prides itself on all student-athletes are st udents first and athletes second, however, it seems that more popular athletes leave early for the pros.In college basketball, many freshman stars are referred to as one and done players as they complete one year of college and go to the professional leagues early, as they want money and need it as curtly as possible. The importance of their education is lost. The University seems to be hypocritical in its actions when it doesnt pay its athletes, because it seems they support college athletes leaving for the Professional league early. One designer suggests that every university pays the same flat rate to each college athlete for deuce-ace years, and then offer a raise to senior athletes. This bonus will create that incentive for students to receive their degrees.While it may seem odd and unjust to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athletes is a necessity not only to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, but also to encourage student s to graduate and get their college degrees. The truth of the matter is that many college athletes are already being paid under thetable which creates a black-market that is not only illegal, but is also unfair to universities that abide by NCAA regulations. Universities are exploiting these students and allowing them not to receive any revenue that they clearly earned. College Athletes Should Be PaidWorks CitedCollege Athletics. Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_athletics. facsimile of Informational Hearing College Athletes. Sacramento, CA, Senate Publications, 2003.